Cod 4 or 6

hello mpgh

ive been reading so DAMN much about cod 4 better than cod 6 and the other way round bla bla blaah.

so now im gonna ask YOU .

1. which game do you think is better (multi-/singleplayer)
2. why?
3. what is the best and worst thing about BOTH.

so im just gonna start:
actually i like cod4 more, because of the reason that the maps arent that much "camper maps".
(you can camp behind every fucking single door or entrance in cod 6, in cod 4 you will just get freakin shot down cause you can shoot through every kind of wall (almost)).
that is also a pro (in my opinion).
you can shoot through many, MANY walls in cod 4, so you arent safe as you have left the window, you need to exit the damn room or get covered behind something more.

now for the next compare: attachements
this is just awfull in cod 6
just look: you sit in a corner, waiting, youdont even need a wallhack, you just need your freakin heartbeat thingy, and tadaa, you know exactly when anyone is coming (apart from you use the right perk, ill come to that now)

and next: perks
now acctually cod 6 is a little better than cod 4 (in some perks).
like scavenger or that you can "level up" your perks up to pro, that is own4g3. also the martyrdom isnt as effective as in cod 4 , thats really good.
BUT:
the perk coldblooded for example sucks.
it just helps too much
the perk UAV-Jammer from cod 4 was better in my opinion.
didnt show you on the UAV, but still made it possible for choppers to attack you. (next and final point)

Finally : Killstreak awards.

in my opinion the killstreak awards from cod 4 were a little few, and also its cool in cod 6 that you can choose which, but some in cod 6 where just unnecessary, like the tactical nuke.
you think your really good for once, and the flow is just awesome for you, and suddenly you get own3d by a nuke that the enemy just activated and you just die.
would be better if it were fewer , but you still could choose.

now lets hear your oppinion

//Tony

P.S.: Im having the pc version.

1. which game do you think is better (multi-/singleplayer)
multiplayer

2. why?
because you get updates in multiplayer, you dont in singleplayer.
and u get to fight other people from around the world.

3. what is the best and worst thing about BOTH.
best thing about mw2 is the umm perks, that for most perks theres an opissite perk to it, like ninja and sitrep.
worst thing about mw2 is the amount of boosters, rank hacks.
best thing in cod 4 is hardly any camping, maps are perfect, more than one bolt action rifle. rarely hitmarkers on sniper weps.

1. which game do you think is better (multi-/singleplayer)

cod 4 multi-cod4 SP

2. why?
dedicated servers/better games/better guns and less noob attachements. HBS etc.

3. what is the best and worst thing about BOTH.
cod4 (good: dedicated) (shit: amount of guns)
mw2 good: SP) (shit: no dedicated) = mass fail


in other dumb words BUY BLACK OPS

Multiplayer.
You can own some noobs.
MW2 is better graphics.

1) CoD4: Dedicated, nice gameplay, awesome 3,5,7 streaks, promodmods etc.
2) Black ops: Nice gameplay (played a beta), nice graphics, awesome killstreaks, dedicated servers, VAC (= FAIL)
3) CoD6, I don't think I see something else then noobtubes, g18's and aimbotters nowadays.

Play MW2 using www.alterIW.net