Project ideas!

Posts 16–30 of 41 · Page 2 of 3
Quote Originally Posted by -Raz0r- View Post
^Not necessarily.
Well, it depends. If the Hardware ID system would work by just checking if the hardware components match, then yes, it's pwned.
I mean merging registry values.
E.G: Merging "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptograph y", "MachineGuid" with "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion", "BuildGuid"
Each computer has a unique HWID.

So how was I pwned again?
Language: Visual Basic or C#
Difficulty: Moderate
Title: Web browser
Description: A web browser that uses either WebKit or the Mozilla Firefox rendering engine
Other details/features: Fully featured peese :P

Quote Originally Posted by Kallisti View Post


Exact same hardware = owned.
You do know hardware have unique IDs, right?
Quote Originally Posted by freedompeace View Post
Language: Visual Basic or C#
Difficulty: Moderate
Title: Web browser
Description: A web browser that uses either WebKit or the Mozilla Firefox rendering engine
Other details/features: Fully featured peese :P



You do know hardware have unique IDs, right?
What if they share hardware
Quote Originally Posted by Kallisti View Post
What if they share hardware
User auth
Quote Originally Posted by skiiiz View Post
I mean merging registry values.
E.G: Merging "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptograph y", "MachineGuid" with "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion", "BuildGuid"
Each computer has a unique HWID.

So how was I pwned again?
You're forgetting the most basic rule of reversing...
All code must run, if I shove that ultra hard packed thingy of yours into a debugger I can step the measures of protection and bypass them, sorry bud, but protecting your software like that is just a waste of time...

Hmmmzz.... I knows this.... how does dutch go again.... starts with an "S" ...
Stupid?
Slim?
uhh... Super cool?
Quote Originally Posted by .::SCHiM::. View Post
You're forgetting the most basic rule of reversing...
All code must run, if I shove that ultra hard packed thingy of yours into a debugger I can step the measures of protection and bypass them, sorry bud, but protecting your software like that is just a waste of time...
Then kindly tell us how we should protect our apps !!
Quote Originally Posted by Hassan View Post


Then kindly tell us how we should protect our apps !!
아니 감사합이다.
Quote Originally Posted by Hassan View Post


Then kindly tell us how we should protect our apps !!
The only thing I can thing off that would be effective, is to buy yourself time.
eg: making the cracking process as repetitive and boring as possible, and using techniques that are hard to bypass for beginners & are hard to automate

But the thing is time & effort are all on the crackers side, it can take a professional years to develop a good protection program, but it can be cracked in a matter of days even by a skid using the the proper tools. And when it's first cracked and analyzed and all your flashy tricks are discovered, the process can be sped up to a matte of hours. To bad for all those years thinkering and working on a un-crackable solution

So to make a long story shot: You cannot possibly 100% protect your ap, you can only force the crackers to invest more time and effort, hopefully scaring the less skilled onces away.
Quote Originally Posted by skiiiz View Post
Language: VB.NET
Difficulty: 9/10
Title: .NET Obfuscator
Description: Make a program that packs .NET objects to prevent reverse engineering & include better deployment.
Other details/features: Have a unique hardware ID system in it to prevent sharing of program.

There you go.
That ought to take you a while...
LOL, this is easy and you put the difficulty to 9/10 ...
Language: Dutch
Difficulty: 10
Title: Learning
Description: Learn dutch
Other details/features: Google translate is forbidden.
Quote Originally Posted by Hell_Demon View Post
Language: Dutch
Difficulty: 10
Title: Learning
Description: Learn dutch
Other details/features: Google translate is forbidden.
Language: Korean
Difficulty: 11/10
Title: Learn
Description: Become fluent in Korean
Other details/features: Good luck. No translators.


The national language people say that Korean is a Level IV language. Taking 63 weeks of formal tutoring to be street proficcient.
How the fuck are the last two projects related to programming ?
Quote Originally Posted by Hassan View Post
How the fuck are the last two projects related to programming ?
he is ought to write a bot that teaches him dutch.
Quote Originally Posted by Hell_Demon View Post
Language: Dutch
Difficulty: 10
Title: Learning
Description: Learn dutch
Other details/features: Google translate is forbidden.
Hmmmzz.... I knows this.... how does dutch go again.... starts with an "S" ...
Posts 16–30 of 41 · Page 2 of 3

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread

None

Need help?