Hey visible,

Originally Posted by Empire

Red: According to both sources, paul was after jesus' death.

Blue: You know, saying "oh hey this part about my religion could also be false" isn't an argument lol, its setting yourself up with a bullseye.

?_? So what if he was an arabian? He can make stuff up too, doesn't mean he's perfect cus he's a terrorist.

Blue: Im trieng to say, why believe 1 but not the other?

According to ALL sources the bible was after jesus' descending up to heaven.

I give up.I SERIOUSLY GIVE UP.
Visible,next time you make a motherfucking post about christianity,bible or anyone related to jesus GET YOUR FAT LAZYASS TO A LIBRARY,AND READ THE BLOODY BIBLE!

Yes you idiot,the new testament was after Jesus died.
Mostly written by 4 of his apostoles.
now go read the bible before I ragequit the debate section by insulting you and swearing in every language and form of them I know!

Originally Posted by Visiblegaming

haha, paul should know, hes a man, he wrote to worship another man [jesus], he planned the death of jesus so he can publish his story...because many had written the bible at the same time of paul, but it was like a competition.

...

Originally Posted by Casavir

I love you to bro.

Originally Posted by Visiblegaming

Blue: Im trieng to say, why believe 1 but not the other?

According to ALL sources the bible was after jesus' descending up to heaven.

Because if you believe all the sources, none of them are correct.

Originally Posted by Empire

Because if you believe all the sources, none of them are correct.

Made no sense.

I believe in the bible and the torah, just not the modern edited ones.

Originally Posted by Visiblegaming

Made no sense.

I believe in the bible and the torah, just not the modern edited ones.

They conflict with each other.

It would be like reading 3 books

Book 1 says "red is right, but not blue"

Book 2 says "blue is right, but not purple"

Book 3 says "Purple is right, but not red"

Originally Posted by Empire

They conflict with each other.

It would be like reading 3 books

Book 1 says "red is right, but not blue"

Book 2 says "blue is right, but not purple"

Book 3 says "Purple is right, but not red"

Wrong, the 3 books actualy are nearly the same, mainly the torah and Quran because of the rules, but in teachings there all equal, all teach to give to the poor, ect.

Originally Posted by Visiblegaming

Wrong, the 3 books actualy are nearly the same, mainly the torah and Quran because of the rules, but in teachings there all equal, all teach to give to the poor, ect.

:/ Moral lessons are different from religious beliefs though.

They contradict each other.

Originally Posted by Visiblegaming

Wrong, the 3 books actualy are nearly the same, mainly the torah and Quran because of the rules, but in teachings there all equal, all teach to give to the poor, ect.

So if you believe in all of them you end up with half of the moral values. Great /

Originally Posted by Alen

So if you believe in all of them you end up with half of the moral values. Great /

Sorry to rage but:

I BELIEVE IN THE UN-EDITED VERSIONS DAMN U!

Originally Posted by Visiblegaming

Sorry to rage but:

I BELIEVE IN THE UN-EDITED VERSIONS DAMN U!

Implying that the un-edited versions are identical?

Originally Posted by Alen

Implying that the un-edited versions are identical?

Actualy when the bible was being compiled some books were left out, and some edited to fit in with modern times [will find the evidence dont worry, i remember researching this].

Originally Posted by Visiblegaming

Actualy when the bible was being compiled some books were left out, and some edited to fit in with modern times [will find the evidence dont worry, i remember researching this].

They still can't be identical to the Qur'an that was created centuries later

For the holes in visible's arguments, he will reply with "i have faith in ________"

Originally Posted by Empire

If you really love me, prove it.

Don't post at my request.

Your ******ry will live on forever !!

Tags for this Thread