i'm on a budget, i'm not building one myself. don't say anything about building my own because it's not happening. i know it's cheaper and better to do it but i'm not doing it. it's not for gaming it's just to get a different computer. i'm getting it within a few days
Well if it isn't for gaming, I would pick the first or second offer, but most likely for second considering it is the enough and have a good price, at least for me.
perhaps ...
You gotta tell us your budget first, Sir.
i just posted 3 which are in my budget. /fp
go for the 3rd one if you want the most performance
#3. I checked the features and that one seems like the best option. quad core + 1TB of memory + 64 bit Windows 7.
Originally Posted by J Miliam
#3. I checked the features and that one seems like the best option. quad core + 1TB of memory + 64 bit Windows 7.
how about the graphics on 3, ATI Radeon HD 4200 w/ 2943 MB memory. is that good or average?
Originally Posted by Saboteur
how about the graphics on 3, ATI Radeon HD 4200 w/ 2943 MB memory. is that good or average?
I wouldn't know, though that's way better than what I have. You might be able to run BF3 at low settings, at least, so I'd call it good.
Acer because I hate HP
Originally Posted by Matt
Acer because I hate HP
considering acer is one of the shittiest brands ever, nope.
Build your own.
Jokes.
Originally Posted by J Miliam
#3. I checked the features and that one seems like the best option. quad core + 1TB of memory + 64 bit Windows 7.
This. ^^^
the 3rd is the best
the graphics are average but it has a great amount of vram
and you can upgrade to a new video card because it has an open pci-e 16x