CrossFire vs. Combat Arms

CrossFire: More game modes. Better Graphics. Better forums. Less hackers. Easy kills for new players. Better community. Still in beta and not many guns. Takes forever to get enough GP to buy a good weapon.

Combat Arms: Like 2 Game modes. Fail Graphics. More hackers. Hard to get kills if your noob. Most players are assholes. More guns and easier GP earned.

You decide which game u like better. I like CrossFire better, but thats my decision.

CrossFire.

Btw, poll it up next time.

Crossfire obviously.

If you have a good enough computer. Combat arms is better for the graphics. But gameplay wise. Crossfire takes it.

Originally Posted by Zhellbound

If you have a good enough computer. Combat arms is better for the graphics. But gameplay wise. Crossfire takes it.

Most definitely.
In CA, you can get shot with 2,000 bullets.
No WAY in real life can you survive that!

In CrossFire, if you get shot, especially in the right place, you're dead.

You must have a shitty ass computer if you think crossfire gfx is better than Combat arms.

Originally Posted by Robert

You must have a shitty ass computer if you think crossfire gfx is better than Combat arms.

Yeah For Real the Only Good thing about crossfire is taking a knife to someguys face! CA is way better on graphics and don't bitch about hackers when your on a hackers website.

Originally Posted by zildjiandw

Yeah For Real the Only Good thing about crossfire is taking a knife to someguys face! CA is way better on graphics and don't bitch about hackers when your on a hackers website.

It's just more fun and funnier if you're the only one hacking.