As you all know, we live in a post 9/11 world. It's been about 7 years after the horrible acts of the radical muslims. Yes, radical muslims, not muslims. There is a difference. A radical will take parts of the Quraan out of context. For example, Islam allows Jihad. Now what is Jihad? It is the struggle for freedom to praise your lord. I'm sure some of you automatically thought about the killing of the innocent when you saw the word Jihad. That is wrong, Islam strictly forbids the killing of the innocent. This "Killing Jihad" is considered to be a last resort, however it is only allowed when there is NO WAY
WHATSOEVER to praise Allah. During that time, only the person who isn't allowing you to praise Allah can be killed. This SHOULD BE rarely used since we don't live in an illiterate world were humanitarian rights don't exist. Now of course, the extremist take this out of context, thinking that they can kill all who are non-believers.
So you would hate that extremist right?
I don't blame you, I do too. However that doesn't mean you should hate all muslims. I'm sure someone is going to post, "Not all muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are muslims."
First off, that's bullshit. Timothy James McVeigh was responsible for the Oklahoma Bombing in 1995.
Secondly, hypothetically speaking, All terrorists are muslim. Does that mean you should hate all muslims? The ones who are scholars of Islam and yet not radicals? So even in this hypothetical situation, it wouldn't make sense to hate all muslims.
I'm sure someone is going to post of ignorant response. To that person or people: Thank you, you have proved my point
Peace be with you all.