Analysis on XINGCODE

Posts 46–60 of 97 · Page 4 of 7

Originally Posted by skottos

leshyrus i have in my mind 2 options
1.can we make a dll like avas dll's and put it inside avas dll's so we can make xingcode3
little stupid bc he didnt know that dll is ours
(like example we take 1 avas dll must have a programe to edit dll we can put in that dll
our code and somehow to inject with the game) xingcode3 detects all the accesibility outside avas folder not inside
2.or we can make it blind so cant see what injects can anyone make this happen?

I have only one answer, CRC check. Rules out both options until we can properly spoof it, which is helluva difficult task.

I WILL REITERATE, DO NOT POST UNLESS IT IS CONTRIBUTING SOURCE CODE OR TOPIC IDEAS ON HOW TO CODE THE BYPASS.

I am getting VERY agitated now. I will ENSURE you receive infractions for off-topic discussion. I don't care if you have "your 2 cents" to throw in, LISTEN TO ME WHEN I TELL YOU THE RULES.

This post is in response to two posts I just deleted.

I might be able to help with finding a way to inject into sudden attack, however, what are you trying to achieve by the code presented?

How about you guys quit guessing and repeating random things. If you don't know what you're talking about then don't spam the thread.

With normal injection they can have your DLL detected and the DLL itself that's being said cause if they see you've injected a DLL they will upload it to their remote server and there they will inspect it. It's not a problem for them to see the DLL whose been injected with the traditional method. After all there is a built in API function to see all the injected DLLs.

Even so, that's not what is getting you guys detected... they have plenty of kernel hooks for known api, they also scan a wide range of hooks for detection... good luck (:

Does anyone have specifics related to the the CRC checks? Like which xigncode module does the scanning, what areas does it check, and how often scans take place.

For the millionth time, it is NOT from a CRC check / scan!!! Your cheats are detected for ( probably ) a multitude of other reasons, but I can for sure tell you it is not from a CRC check. Also, I wouldn't bother "bypassing" xigncode because not only is it a ginormous and nearly impossible task, they update A LOT they actually care about the games they support... Your "bypass" will get detected super fast, trust me. I'm probably the only one here with A. prior experience with this anticheat. and B. An actual software engineer.
I have been coding for over 6 years... Try taking my advice

Lol, we are not trying to pass their CRC check.

@Jabberwock That's what the others are saying, so I'm letting them know that's not what is happening.

I asked for detailed facts about the anti cheat not excuses. If you aren't here to help then don't post.

FALLEN, if you want to tell us about this multitude of reasons then I would appreciate it, but I don't need your life story.

Originally Posted by ~FALLEN~

For the millionth time, it is NOT from a CRC check / scan!!! Your cheats are detected for ( probably ) a multitude of other reasons, but I can for sure tell you it is not from a CRC check. Also, I wouldn't bother "bypassing" xigncode because not only is it a ginormous and nearly impossible task, they update A LOT they actually care about the games they support... Your "bypass" will get detected super fast, trust me. I'm probably the only one here with A. prior experience with this anticheat. and B. An actual software engineer.
I have been coding for over 6 years... Try taking my advice

Considering every resource for XIGNCODE3 bypass's include CRC check spoofing I would say the former is false. We specifically may not be, but he is, and he wants the information.

Originally Posted by CyanideC00kies

I asked for detailed facts about the anti cheat not excuses. If you aren't here to help then don't post.

FALLEN, if you want to tell us about this multitude of reasons then I would appreciate it, but I don't need your life story.

I will attempt to locate the information for you.

@CyanideC00kies if I tell you what the anticheat does then that takes the whole learning aspect out of this, I'm not doing that. What I will tell you is that it would be much more viable to work around the anticheat instead of bypassing / removing it. Also try not to be so rude when you're asking for help in the future, thank you.
@Lehsyrus To create an actual bypass for xigncode you would need a developers key to actually bypass it, or Unless you have mad coding skills, great at reverse engineering, have access to a driver and can write ring0 code properly for both x86 and x64. I just about guarantee you won't be able to bypass it otherwise.

Originally Posted by Lehsyrus

Considering every resource for XIGNCODE3 bypass's include CRC check spoofing I would say the former is false. We specifically may not be, but he is, and he wants the information.

We don't really need a full bypass so this is just pointless. You want to inject a dll? Use manual mapping method. You want your injector to be undetected? Make it so the anti-cheat won't be able to find it.(That was just a hint) You want to make a simple trainer? You can without any bypass. (Assuming you disabled XC services).

You want to make CE undetected? Well, that's a different story.

Originally Posted by ~FALLEN~

@CyanideC00kies if I tell you what the anticheat does then that takes the whole learning aspect out of this, I'm not doing that. What I will tell you is that it would be much more viable to work around the anticheat instead of bypassing / removing it. Also try not to be so rude when you're asking for help in the future, thank you.
@Lehsyrus To create an actual bypass for xigncode you would need a developers key to actually bypass it, or Unless you have mad coding skills, great at reverse engineering, have access to a driver and can write ring0 code properly for both x86 and x64. I just about guarantee you won't be able to bypass it otherwise.

I agree that it is easier to simply work around it, but you make it out to be impossible to bypass when I know of six people that have done it successfully (VIP programmers do names will not be mentioned). What I am saying is, he asked a question, the answer tithe question is not whether it is viable or not, and that is it. I myself do not have enough programming experience to do this, I have admitted it many times, but that still does not mean it is impossible for others.

---------- Post added at 04:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:15 PM ----------

Originally Posted by Jabberwock

We don't really need a full bypass so this is just pointless. You want to inject a dll? Use manual mapping method. You want your injector to be undetected? Make it so the anti-cheat won't be able to find it.(That was just a hint) You want to make a simple trainer? You can without any bypass. (Assuming you disabled XC services).

You want to make CE undetected? Well, that's a different story.

The question was not whether it is viable or not, which is my point. Eventually XIGNVODE3 will implement methods to d/c te game of a service is detected to be disabled as it did with other games, and will also be able to detect the multiple different injection methods as well, either way having someone developing a bypass will be beneficial in the long run.