CA=COD
I have a feeling that Combat Arms will slowly be formed into COD. The new CA trailer looks like COD, the JFC Suit or whatever they are, they look like COD. by the time it's prob phase 3 it will be like COD. i fink 
CA=COD
people said the same thing when turret was new, like sentry gun. also when vertigo came out they said it was like highrise. the list goes on and on
---------- Post added at 01:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:54 AM ----------
heres an old post from 2010
@Jabuuty671
Originally Posted by jabuuty671
---------- Post added at 01:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:54 AM ----------
heres an old post from 2010
@Jabuuty671
Originally Posted by jabuuty671
Okay, guys. Just recently, I started getting addicted to Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2.
I have about 15 hours of gameplay on my MW2 account and about over so many hours on Combat Arms.
I used to play Combat Arms at least 3 days a week, but about a month ago my computer stopped cooperating so I decided to quit, but I have went on yesterday for the first time in a while and did quite well.
anybody notice the MANY NEW similarities in Combat Arms and Call of Duty now?
well Combat Arms similarities from CoD:MW2
Please list some more (opinion based: "Rip-offs") or similarities below
Call of Duty:
Sentry Gun
Combat Arms:
Auto Turret
Call of Duty:
Highrise
Combat Arms:
Vertigo
Call of Duty:
ACR, Intervention, etc;
Combat Arms:
released ACR and Intervention not too long ago.
I know i know, don't tell me again. i've heard it before.
I have about 15 hours of gameplay on my MW2 account and about over so many hours on Combat Arms.
I used to play Combat Arms at least 3 days a week, but about a month ago my computer stopped cooperating so I decided to quit, but I have went on yesterday for the first time in a while and did quite well.
anybody notice the MANY NEW similarities in Combat Arms and Call of Duty now?
well Combat Arms similarities from CoD:MW2
Please list some more (opinion based: "Rip-offs") or similarities below
Call of Duty:
Sentry Gun
Combat Arms:
Auto Turret
Call of Duty:
Highrise
Combat Arms:
Vertigo
Call of Duty:
ACR, Intervention, etc;
Combat Arms:
released ACR and Intervention not too long ago.
I know i know, don't tell me again. i've heard it before.
you cant really say who copied who because they are the same type of games what they are going to release would somehow be related.
Originally Posted by BenXer
you can't really who copied who because they are somehow going to be related.
---------- Post added at 04:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:27 AM ----------
you cant really say who copied who because they are the same type of games what they are going to release would somehow be related.
---------- Post added at 04:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:27 AM ----------
you cant really say who copied who because they are the same type of games what they are going to release would somehow be related.
Yeah well, where else re they going to get their ideas from, they run on NX cash
Age old debate! Majority of all FPS games get inspiration from each other.
Originally Posted by Justin
Age old debate! Majority of all FPS games get inspiration from each other.
Whole reason why it's called a FIRST PERSON SHOOTER and there's only so far you can go with that.
Originally Posted by Justin
Age old debate! Majority of all FPS games get inspiration from each other.
Remington could sue Nexon, because they use remington products in the Combat Arms game without a license to do so.
Magpul could sue Nexon because on the ACR (Aka Magpul Masada\Bushmaster ACR) is property of Magpul\Bushmaster, and on the ACR model it displays "FN Herstal" which is an entirely different weapons manufacturer.
FN H. Makes the Scar-L, P90, FS\F200.
Sig Sauer produces the P226 series, the SG55X series.
Springfield armaments produces the, M21, M14, M1 Garand and a few other weapons.
The few guns that can't infringe on copyright are simply the ones with a broadened name such as:
"M4A1" which describes a variant of AR15. Which might infringe on Armalites copyright, not sure if Armalite let the AR15\AR10 become public domain though.
See what im saying?
Originally Posted by Paralyze Jr.
Inspiration and copyright infringement are two entirely different things.
Remington could sue Nexon, because they use remington products in the Combat Arms game without a license to do so.
Magpul could sue Nexon because on the ACR (Aka Magpul Masada\Bushmaster ACR) is property of Magpul\Bushmaster, and on the ACR model it displays "FN Herstal" which is an entirely different weapons manufacturer.
FN H. Makes the Scar-L, P90, FS\F200.
Sig Sauer produces the P226 series, the SG55X series.
Springfield armaments produces the, M21, M14, M1 Garand and a few other weapons.
The few guns that can't infringe on copyright are simply the ones with a broadened name such as:
"M4A1" which describes a variant of AR15. Which might infringe on Armalites copyright, not sure if Armalite let the AR15\AR10 become public domain though.
See what im saying?
Remington could sue Nexon, because they use remington products in the Combat Arms game without a license to do so.
Magpul could sue Nexon because on the ACR (Aka Magpul Masada\Bushmaster ACR) is property of Magpul\Bushmaster, and on the ACR model it displays "FN Herstal" which is an entirely different weapons manufacturer.
FN H. Makes the Scar-L, P90, FS\F200.
Sig Sauer produces the P226 series, the SG55X series.
Springfield armaments produces the, M21, M14, M1 Garand and a few other weapons.
The few guns that can't infringe on copyright are simply the ones with a broadened name such as:
"M4A1" which describes a variant of AR15. Which might infringe on Armalites copyright, not sure if Armalite let the AR15\AR10 become public domain though.
See what im saying?
Originally Posted by Paralyze Jr.
Inspiration and copyright infringement are two entirely different things.
Remington could sue Nexon, because they use remington products in the Combat Arms game without a license to do so.
Magpul could sue Nexon because on the ACR (Aka Magpul Masada\Bushmaster ACR) is property of Magpul\Bushmaster, and on the ACR model it displays "FN Herstal" which is an entirely different weapons manufacturer.
FN H. Makes the Scar-L, P90, FS\F200.
Sig Sauer produces the P226 series, the SG55X series.
Springfield armaments produces the, M21, M14, M1 Garand and a few other weapons.
The few guns that can't infringe on copyright are simply the ones with a broadened name such as:
"M4A1" which describes a variant of AR15. Which might infringe on Armalites copyright, not sure if Armalite let the AR15\AR10 become public domain though.
See what im saying?
Remington could sue Nexon, because they use remington products in the Combat Arms game without a license to do so.
Magpul could sue Nexon because on the ACR (Aka Magpul Masada\Bushmaster ACR) is property of Magpul\Bushmaster, and on the ACR model it displays "FN Herstal" which is an entirely different weapons manufacturer.
FN H. Makes the Scar-L, P90, FS\F200.
Sig Sauer produces the P226 series, the SG55X series.
Springfield armaments produces the, M21, M14, M1 Garand and a few other weapons.
The few guns that can't infringe on copyright are simply the ones with a broadened name such as:
"M4A1" which describes a variant of AR15. Which might infringe on Armalites copyright, not sure if Armalite let the AR15\AR10 become public domain though.
See what im saying?
Originally Posted by AVGN
How do you know that they do not have a license to do so?
@Justin
They're a big enough company (# 3 on the top F2p game producers I believe, with a worth of like 20 billion dollars or MORE) where they can just pay any fines. They're keeping it vague though, "M4A1" "M16A3"
So to my knowledge, you do need a license, and I don't see it being held up in the air while reading their TOS.
Originally Posted by Paralyze Jr.
Because they're advertising other manufacturers on half the models. Like how I mentioned the ACR has FNHersta'ls logo on it (It even says "FN Herstal")
@Justin
They're a big enough company (# 3 on the top F2p game producers I believe, with a worth of like 20 billion dollars or MORE) where they can just pay any fines. They're keeping it vague though, "M4A1" "M16A3"
So to my knowledge, you do need a license, and I don't see it being held up in the air while reading their TOS.
@Justin
They're a big enough company (# 3 on the top F2p game producers I believe, with a worth of like 20 billion dollars or MORE) where they can just pay any fines. They're keeping it vague though, "M4A1" "M16A3"
So to my knowledge, you do need a license, and I don't see it being held up in the air while reading their TOS.
Originally Posted by AVGN
It's also free advertisement for weapons manufacturers.
"Doesn't matter, sued for 5 billion"
Its also false advertising. It's also illegal. It's also the fact 80% of people who play CA are liberal dipshits who vote yes for gun control but then go and kill 100 people in cod and CA.
To be honest Nexon DID a really bad job trying to copy/recreate Ghost from MW2.
Thats nexon for ya!
Thats nexon for ya!
They have many features in common but cod is still better than CA atm. 
This thread is closed for replies.
Similar Threads
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare (MW) HacksA question regarding No DvD hack for COD 4, Wndows VistaIN 2 Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare (MW) HacksCOD 4 Download free cracked server?BA 1 Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare (MW) HacksCracked Server list COD 4
11 Trade Accounts/Keys/ItemsTRADING CoD 4 CD KEY.PA 2
11 Trade Accounts/Keys/ItemsTRADING CoD 4 CD KEY.PA 2