How to make boter?

^Title^
Thanx for all

U mean booter? or aimbot? or what u mean?

i wish i knw how 2 maek boters 22 man

hard stuf

Originally Posted by koala909

^Title^
Thanx for all

Deep within of the depths of your prized processor lies a deep dark world of branch misunderprediction aliasing. Only the truly brave among us delve into the art of branch misunderprediction correction. Take the following branching misdirection ratification algorithm in a disassembly:

Code:

0151A182 C74424 20 5AC2F7>MOV DWORD PTR SS:[ESP+20],FDF7C25A 0151A18A 60 PUSHAD 0151A18B C60424 7C MOV BYTE PTR SS:[ESP],7C 0151A18F C74424 3C 9D7AC9>MOV DWORD PTR SS:[ESP+3C],3C97A9D 0151A197 C64424 04 20 MOV BYTE PTR SS:[ESP+4],20 0151A19C 886424 10 MOV BYTE PTR SS:[ESP+10],AH 0151A1A0 885424 04 MOV BYTE PTR SS:[ESP+4],DL 0151A1A4 8D6424 3C LEA ESP,DWORD PTR SS:[ESP+3C] 0151A1AD 0000 ADD BYTE PTR DS:[EAX],AL 0151A31F 76 61 JBE SHORT 0151A382

At the end lies an JBE instruction, which is conditional branching, and thus the branch predictor will predictor the branch. Now herein lies the branch misunderprediction issue. As the cpu metaparses the binary inputs, the CPUID causes a hash collision between the RTDSC processor sector and the physical memory branch analysis sector. This is because the JBE instruction has been incorrectly cached by ring -1 IO input ports. The only way to correct this inherent flaw in x86 micro architecture algorithms in via wasting several clock cycles to save several hundred. The most logical way to construct a fix is via 500 or greater NOP instructions in sequence. Below i will post a preprocessor macro that should be placed in the if block of conditional statements about 5 times to exponentially increase performance. I'm talking an FPS increase of 20 to 300 type performance boost.

Code:

#define GOFASTLOL for(int i = 0; i < 500; i++) { __asm{ NOP } }

TLDR: Put that ^ in your code it go vroom vroom

Originally Posted by Saltine

Deep within of the depths of your prized processor lies a deep dark world of branch misunderprediction aliasing. Only the truly brave among us delve into the art of branch misunderprediction correction. Take the following branching misdirection ratification algorithm in a disassembly:

Code:

0151A182 C74424 20 5AC2F7>MOV DWORD PTR SS:[ESP+20],FDF7C25A 0151A18A 60 PUSHAD 0151A18B C60424 7C MOV BYTE PTR SS:[ESP],7C 0151A18F C74424 3C 9D7AC9>MOV DWORD PTR SS:[ESP+3C],3C97A9D 0151A197 C64424 04 20 MOV BYTE PTR SS:[ESP+4],20 0151A19C 886424 10 MOV BYTE PTR SS:[ESP+10],AH 0151A1A0 885424 04 MOV BYTE PTR SS:[ESP+4],DL 0151A1A4 8D6424 3C LEA ESP,DWORD PTR SS:[ESP+3C] 0151A1AD 0000 ADD BYTE PTR DS:[EAX],AL 0151A31F 76 61 JBE SHORT 0151A382

At the end lies an JBE instruction, which is conditional branching, and thus the branch predictor will predictor the branch. Now herein lies the branch misunderprediction issue. As the cpu metaparses the binary inputs, the CPUID causes a hash collision between the RTDSC processor sector and the physical memory branch analysis sector. This is because the JBE instruction has been incorrectly cached by ring -1 IO input ports. The only way to correct this inherent flaw in x86 micro architecture algorithms in via wasting several clock cycles to save several hundred. The most logical way to construct a fix is via 500 or greater NOP instructions in sequence. Below i will post a preprocessor macro that should be placed in the if block of conditional statements about 5 times to exponentially increase performance. I'm talking an FPS increase of 20 to 300 type performance boost.

Code:

#define GOFASTLOL for(int i = 0; i < 500; i++) { __asm{ NOP } }

TLDR: Put that ^ in your code it go vroom vroom

you smart little cookie :P

Originally Posted by lucasheer715

you smart little cookie :P

Wat the fuk r u say to me bitch

Originally Posted by Saltine

Wat the fuk r u say to me bitch

its a compliment......

Originally Posted by lucasheer715

its a compliment......

Dud fuk of stop make fun of me this not apropriaet i will report

Originally Posted by Saltine

Dud fuk of stop make fun of me this not apropriaet i will report

Why don't you speak English.

Originally Posted by Saltine

Dud fuk of stop make fun of me this not apropriaet i will report

i was saying ur smart and you know what your talking about.... sorry i was saying this??

Originally Posted by lucasheer715

i was saying ur smart and you know what your talking about.... sorry i was saying this??

Lol ik im just entertaining myself