[EXPERIMENTAL] Metamorphic obfuscator

Posts 16–17 of 17 · Page 2 of 2
Oh god people.
Don't let your egotistical selves turn this into a HF butthurt thread >.<

Just be greatful for the release. Arguing about the name doesn't do shit.
Quote Originally Posted by Kenshin13 View Post
Oh god people.
Don't let your egotistical selves turn this into a HF butthurt thread >.<

Just be greatful for the release. Arguing about the name doesn't do shit.
I'm more concerned about incorrect concepts being repeated and repeated and passed around- this isn't about the name of the release itself; the name of the release is just a result of what we're discussing.

Anyway, OP, here's what you should do first: make it fix address locations. This is extremely important... without it, anything that program makes will be a mangled mess that doesn't work and jumps to horrifically wrong locations.

This is not a trivial problem, and I think that knowing whether a literal is an address or not is a semi-decidable problem; (and what if something in a program IS used as an address, but the outcome of the program is influenced by that address? e.g a program that prints the address of something. if your obfuscator is perfect, then even though the actual address of the information has changed, it still prints out the original address) however, you can still make a program that rewrites addresses correctly in the vast majority of use cases.
Posts 16–17 of 17 · Page 2 of 2

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread

None

Talk with us