Outdated💡 gDaap Bypasser

Posts 46–60 of 98 · Page 4 of 7
Quote Originally Posted by killonsight22 View Post
whats this mean ??

[gDaap Bypasser] [ERROR] Error loading Lua code into buffer (Syntax Error)[[string "MZ�"]:1: '=' expected near '<eof>']
why are you trying to run a dll/exe
idk what im doing lol im trying to use the hack im trying everything man
Quote Originally Posted by iMythik View Post
this could literally be detected with 1 line
and if your garbage p2c is detected by my 10 minute AC theres no way in hell you bypass LeyAC
lol
Show me the one line of maqic code please
Quote Originally Posted by kasperbjerby View Post
What is wrong with this "shit"?
Plz tell me why you advice people from using this?
And tell me what they should use instead..
why do you use loadstring instead of loadbuffer.
Quote Originally Posted by tdsx View Post
why do you use loadstring instead of loadbuffer.
why do you and op sucks?
why is this bypasser such trash?
Quote Originally Posted by z346etn56jzd7egth View Post
He probably meant detected, lol.
no, i mean it's uber trash (and even more than yours)
and yes it's detected
Quote Originally Posted by Kona-chan View Post
no, i mean it's uber trash (and even more than yours)
and yes it's detected
Listen child.. Why don't you tell me how and why it is trash?
If you can't say anything usefull why don't you just fuck off?

Quote Originally Posted by tdsx View Post
why do you use loadstring instead of loadbuffer.
It doesn't matter -.-'
Quote Originally Posted by kasperbjerby View Post
Listen child.. Why don't you tell me how and why it is trash?
If you can't say anything usefull why don't you just fuck off?



It doesn't matter -.-'
ignore them, as long as it works the way you want then you are fine. someone once told me "a hack IS a hack".
Quote Originally Posted by kasperbjerby View Post
It doesn't matter -.-'
Quote Originally Posted by MeepDarknessMeep View Post
ignore them, as long as it works the way you want then you are fine. someone once told me "a hack IS a hack".
yes it does. you can read the source of whatever is ran with loadstring by using debug.getinfo. you can't read the source of whatever is ran with loadbuffer.

[gDaap Bypasser] [ERROR] Error calling Lua code (Runtime Error)[[string "--[[..."]:51: attempt to index global 'draw' (a nil value)]

that's how I know you're using loadstring. if you use loadbuffer you can fake the source as a legitimate file or whatever else you want.
Quote Originally Posted by tdsx View Post
yes it does. you can read the source of whatever is ran with loadstring by using debug.getinfo. you can't read the source of whatever is ran with loadbuffer.

[gDaap Bypasser] [ERROR] Error calling Lua code (Runtime Error)[[string "--[[..."]:51: attempt to index global 'draw' (a nil value)]

that's how I know you're using loadstring. if you use loadbuffer you can fake the source as a legitimate file or whatever else you want.
Then why on earth would i use loadbuffer? Yaa maybe one sygo anticheat that use that kind of shit method to detect shit will see me or steal a bit of my lua code..
But.. I can debug my shit.. I would like to be able to debug my shit and see errors thanks
Quote Originally Posted by kasperbjerby View Post
Then why on earth would i use loadbuffer? Yaa maybe one sygo anticheat that use that kind of shit method to detect shit will see me or steal a bit of my lua code..
But.. I can debug my shit.. I would like to be able to debug my shit and see errors thanks
this bypasser is retarded for the following reasons:
- You are gay, you paste and you suck.
- It doesn't use RunString.
- You are gay and you fap to Yaoi (also well known as Shonen-ai) Videos.
Quote Originally Posted by Kona-chan View Post
this bypasser is retarded for the following reasons:
- You are gay, you paste and you suck.
- It doesn't use RunString.
- You are gay and you fap to Yaoi (also well known as Shonen-ai) Videos.
So you have no real reason to think this is bad.. Beside it not using runstring (i don't know why on earth you would find that to be a must)
Quote Originally Posted by kasperbjerby View Post
So you have no real reason to think this is bad.. Beside it not using runstring (i don't know why on earth you would find that to be a must)
It's a must because it allows to change all settings you need to be undetected by most acs, while your trash gets detected by any basic anticheat.
Oh yes, and because you can make your own lua state and then use RunString. (but if you have enough knownledge to do that, you don't need lua, you can just use c++)
Quote Originally Posted by kasperbjerby View Post
Then why on earth would i use loadbuffer? Yaa maybe one sygo anticheat that use that kind of shit method to detect shit will see me or steal a bit of my lua code..
But.. I can debug my shit.. I would like to be able to debug my shit and see errors thanks
i think he was mentioning the
string "--[[..."]:51:
part
if you don't use loadstring it won't show...
but since it really doesn't matter since it will be detected either way do whatever
Quote Originally Posted by kasperbjerby View Post
Then why on earth would i use loadbuffer? Yaa maybe one sygo anticheat that use that kind of shit method to detect shit will see me or steal a bit of my lua code..
But.. I can debug my shit.. I would like to be able to debug my shit and see errors thanks
you can see the errors with loadbuffer. jesus christ I'm not even gonna bother with kids like you who are clueless.

Quote Originally Posted by MeepDarknessMeep View Post
i think he was mentioning the
string "--[[..."]:51:
part
if you don't use loadstring it won't show...
but since it really doesn't matter since it will be detected either way do whatever
it's not that it would be detected, it would be that they can't steal your code. the extra parameter to specify the source is just an extra benefit that would allow you to fake the source.
Posts 46–60 of 98 · Page 4 of 7
This thread is closed for replies.

Similar Threads

Talk with us