PC - MPGH

Originally Posted by Eternity

I know it's not that decent but it's ok

You should get a new cooler

Originally Posted by bowlcut

OS: Windows 98 SE
Motherboard: FIC PA2005
CPU: AMD K6-2
Memory: 128MB PC100
Hard Drive: 12GB IDE
Video Card: Orchid Righteous 3D II
Sound Card: Crystal ISA
Monitor: Sony Trinitron Multiscan 200sf 17"
Mouse: Microsoft Intellimouse
Keyboard: IBM Model M

Get on my level, nerds.

Must have been an expensive build.

Originally Posted by Bodvar

You should get a new cooler

Must have been an expensive build.

I am burning over 20 files. I am running videos. I am on MPGH. I got a game running.

Originally Posted by Eternity

I am burning over 20 files. I am running videos. I am on MPGH. I got a game running.

Oh
ok
2short

CPU: i7 4960x
Motherboard: Gigabyte-X79-UD3
RAM: 12GB G-Skill Ares
Storage: 1TB Samsung 840 Evo SSD
GPU: (2) XFX R9 295X2
Case: Corsair 750D
PSU: 1600W EVGA Supernova G2
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo
Monitor: I have (1) Samsung 4K monitor, but I'm hoping to get 2 more when I get paid in a few weeks.

CPU: Intel core i5-4440
RAM: 16GB (2x8GB) KingStone DDR3
H.D: 2TB W.D Blue
MotherBoard: GIGABYTE INTEL B86-HD6
PowerSupply: Cooler Master 700W Bronze
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Nepton 240M Water CPU Cooler

Originally Posted by Mokou-Sama

How about games like League of Legends, Skyrim, ah... most mainstream titles and MMOs? DO you think its supported?

usually not. i doubt it is

cpu: 3770k@ 4.7ghz
Ram: corsair vengence 32gb @1866
MB: ausu rog maximus V forumula
GPU: Asus GTX titan
SSD: 256 samsum, 128 ocz and 2tb seagate
Moniter: asus vg27he
keyboard: logitech g19
mouse: logitech g19

Being broke sucks.

CPU: AMD Phenom x4 @ 3.1Ghz
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4850 @ 512mb
RAM: DDR2 4GB
MOBO: Unknown
PSU: Unknown 500w
HDD: 6,5TB, Various brands.
SSD: None.
CASE: Unknown.
OS: Windows 8.1 x64 and Windows 7 Ultimate x64.

Originally Posted by Mokou-Sama

@Killian how good is your CPU for gaming? I'm asking since I want to know how do those AMD handle for gaming.
Since its a bit cheaper then intel I'd like to know how long you have it and troubles it had.

I plan on putting a PC with a AMD 8 core processor in the future. Not now though xD.

The 8350 is the most popular in terms of price/performance ratio. It's best compared to an Intel i5 2500K. If you win the silicon lottery, you can probably OC an 8350 to 4.8-5GHz range with liquid cooling of course. I've had mine for 4~ months; haven't had any issues except overheating but that's my fault for jumping the gun on a shitty AIO Corsair H60, which would probably be sufficient for a Pentium 4. Honestly, if you're building a "future-proof" rig, stay away from AMD right now. We haven't seen anything new from AMD since 2012's Piledriver which was a rehash of Bulldozer: both flops. The AM3+ socket is most likely dead so you're looking at upgrading your mobo, CPU, and possibly RAM (since they have to respond to Intel's DDR4 push) 1-2 years down the road if you want to continue with AMD. Supposedly they've got some new performance-level tech in the works for 2016 but for right now we're stuck with FX. I mean if you're really on a tight budget go FX. You won't be disappointed but you won't be dazzled. It'll hold you over the hump into 2016. That's why I'm done with this rig. X99, here I come.

Anyone else keeping up with Nvidia and the GTX 970? Thinking of returning mine to Newegg for a full refund then go for the 980, or wait and see what AMD has to offer with the 390/390X.

Originally Posted by Killian

Anyone else keeping up with Nvidia and the GTX 970? Thinking of returning mine to Newegg for a full refund then go for the 980, or wait and see what AMD has to offer with the 390/390X.

I would return the 970 and upgrade, I was going to buy a 970 myself but after finding out about the top end bottleneck I'm holding out for a 980.

I know most would say the top end bottleneck is negligible at best but running an ultrawide, every little bit helps.

Also, here's my shiz for other people:

Originally Posted by Killian

The 8350 is the most popular in terms of price/performance ratio. It's best compared to an Intel i5 2500K. If you win the silicon lottery, you can probably OC an 8350 to 4.8-5GHz range with liquid cooling of course. I've had mine for 4~ months; haven't had any issues except overheating but that's my fault for jumping the gun on a shitty AIO Corsair H60, which would probably be sufficient for a Pentium 4. Honestly, if you're building a "future-proof" rig, stay away from AMD right now. We haven't seen anything new from AMD since 2012's Piledriver which was a rehash of Bulldozer: both flops. The AM3+ socket is most likely dead so you're looking at upgrading your mobo, CPU, and possibly RAM (since they have to respond to Intel's DDR4 push) 1-2 years down the road if you want to continue with AMD. Supposedly they've got some new performance-level tech in the works for 2016 but for right now we're stuck with FX. I mean if you're really on a tight budget go FX. You won't be disappointed but you won't be dazzled. It'll hold you over the hump into 2016. That's why I'm done with this rig. X99, here I come.

Anyone else keeping up with Nvidia and the GTX 970? Thinking of returning mine to Newegg for a full refund then go for the 980, or wait and see what AMD has to offer with the 390/390X.

Thanks for the info! Thanked.

Not a bad build.

I'm getting a pc of my own today.

Originally Posted by Justin

Just got off the phone with Newegg's customer service. Got a full refund in store credit, using that and paying the difference to get a 980. Just gotta send this 970 back.

CPU: Intel i5 4670k @ 4.2GHZ
GPU: EVGA ACX 780 Superclocked
RAM: Corsair LP (2x4GB)
MOBO: Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO
PSU: Corsair RM850 80+ Gold
HDD: 2TB Seagate Hybrid Drive, 500GB WD Blue and 2x120GB Samsung EVO SSD's for boot.
CASE: Fractal Design Define R4 Black Pearl w/ Window
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate

How did you take that screen shot?????????

PC

Post a Reply

Tags for this Thread