[Detected] clockwork's tiny hacks #11c - Page 12 - MPGH

Originally Posted by JDoawp

I've said it before and I'm saying it again. NOT POSSIBLE.

What is the actual reason its not possible? different programing language? I am honestly quite interested.
Also what would prevent you from implementing a source scrambler or obfuscator so that the file hash is different?

Originally Posted by tttwq111

What is the actual reason its not possible? different programing language? I am honestly quite interested.
Also what would prevent you from implementing a source scrambler or obfuscator so that the file hash is different?

The build process is just not very friendly. It's made of two separate projects (one for the loader and one for the hack), a bunch of unusual compiler settings (to create the tiny code), and something like six custom post-build tools. I did implement my own system for changing file hashes though. That's one of the post build tools.

Plus I just don't want to post my source.

Originally Posted by clockwork235

The build process is just not very friendly. It's made of two separate projects (one for the loader and one for the hack), a bunch of unusual compiler settings (to create the tiny code), and something like six custom post-build tools. I did implement my own system for changing file hashes though. That's one of the post build tools.

Plus I just don't want to post my source.

Right I understand. So it does mimic polyloader functionality by changing the hashes per user or is this not the case? I'm not sure how much you know about the inner workings of VAC but since polyloader so far has a very low dedection rate what is stopping you from replicating that that would be really nice

I understand you don't want to post source to have people rip it for something you worked hard on especially in the hacking scene. I myself coming from php scene am much more about all the open-source stuff :P

Originally Posted by tttwq111

Right I understand. So it does mimic polyloader functionality by changing the hashes per user or is this not the case? I'm not sure how much you know about the inner workings of VAC but since polyloader so far has a very low dedection rate what is stopping you from replicating that that would be really nice

I understand you don't want to post source to have people rip it for something you worked hard on especially in the hacking scene. I myself coming from php scene am much more about all the open-source stuff :P

I can change the hash per compilation (like polyloader) but I can't change it per user, because I can't upload that many files here. Color would kill me.

Still UD? // tooshoort

Originally Posted by k25boost

I need a new cs go acc who can sell me some for cheap?

Steam sale coming in 1 hour and 30 min.

I have a prediction, this vac wave will be huge

cool thx <tooshort>><>

guys, stay a bit away from this cheat until sales start ^^

Originally Posted by T-800

guys, stay a bit away from this cheat until sales start ^^

This guy...

Each post you make is to tell how much Poly is good and shit.

If you like it so much, just stay with it and leave this topic alone. You don't need to throw Polyshit to our faces.

We can read when something is detected or not. We don't need your advices.

Jm2c.

Originally Posted by Gordalhao

This guy...

Each post you make is to tell how much Poly is good and shit.

If you like it so much, just stay with it and leave this topic alone. You don't need to throw Polyshit to our faces.

We can read when something is detected or not. We don't need your advices.

Jm2c.

Are u retarded? i just dont want those peoples to get VAC'ed, i like this cheat too. If u have problems with me just PM me

this hack work's after the patch?

idk if i should risk trying this hack after this update :/

Originally Posted by Viperious

idk if i should risk trying this hack after this update :/

just wait for a new status

CS:GO in Summer Sale 50% Off

Detectedclockwork's tiny hacks #11c

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread