Originally Posted by Meatstake
I just played some comps, this is most likely UD. But i would like to get something off my chest at this point. I recently have seen a lot of posts in this Forum, claiming with using poly, you will get an UNIQUE source-code every time you recompile a hack. This is simply not true, everyone is getting the same source-code, but randomized. Of course is the code itself "unique" after randomization, but this doesn't mean its uncrackable.
Im sure, there have been encrypting/randomizing-systems who where way more complex than poly and they got decrypted aswell. Its only the mather of how much effort and money they are willing to invest. Atm i would say, poly-stuff is even safer then a private-hack, since they apparently weren't able to crack it jet
Maybe, the decryption of Poly would cost so much, that it isnt even viable for volvo to do it. (wich would make poly extremely safe) Not likely, but possible.. But what do i know.
tldr; Polyloader is a genius masterpiece, but its not impossible to decrypt (no security measures are undogeable)
Im sure, there have been encrypting/randomizing-systems who where way more complex than poly and they got decrypted aswell. Its only the mather of how much effort and money they are willing to invest. Atm i would say, poly-stuff is even safer then a private-hack, since they apparently weren't able to crack it jet
Maybe, the decryption of Poly would cost so much, that it isnt even viable for volvo to do it. (wich would make poly extremely safe) Not likely, but possible.. But what do i know.
tldr; Polyloader is a genius masterpiece, but its not impossible to decrypt (no security measures are undogeable)
) 
, mercy said that xD , some guys said that VAC need to change the scan to heuristic to detect polyhack // i don't know if this is true but MERCY for me is a god.
