Originally Posted by Meatstake
I just played some comps, this is most likely UD. But i would like to get something off my chest at this point. I recently have seen a lot of posts in this Forum, claiming with using poly, you will get an UNIQUE source-code every time you recompile a hack. This is simply not true, everyone is getting the same source-code, but randomized. Of course is the code itself "unique" after randomization, but this doesn't mean its uncrackable.
Im sure, there have been encrypting/randomizing-systems who where way more complex than poly and they got decrypted aswell. Its only the mather of how much effort and money they are willing to invest. Atm i would say, poly-stuff is even safer then a private-hack, since they apparently weren't able to crack it jet
Maybe, the decryption of Poly would cost so much, that it isnt even viable for volvo to do it. (wich would make poly extremely safe) Not likely, but possible.. But what do i know.
tldr; Polyloader is a genius masterpiece, but its not impossible to decrypt (no security measures are undogeable)
Im sure, there have been encrypting/randomizing-systems who where way more complex than poly and they got decrypted aswell. Its only the mather of how much effort and money they are willing to invest. Atm i would say, poly-stuff is even safer then a private-hack, since they apparently weren't able to crack it jet
Maybe, the decryption of Poly would cost so much, that it isnt even viable for volvo to do it. (wich would make poly extremely safe) Not likely, but possible.. But what do i know.
tldr; Polyloader is a genius masterpiece, but its not impossible to decrypt (no security measures are undogeable)
Now this decryption would have to happen on a massive scale to actually be effective, but what happens when they decrypt someone who didn't use Engima or maybe they decrypted VMProtect, and the PolyLoader, but people who use Engima will be safe? It will take months or maybe years before they can crack all those codes and put in a system that can actively decrypt and flag PloyHack users, and thats some time that I don't think VAC will take just to get rid of one hack.
TLDR; Safe for now.
- - - Updated - - -
Originally Posted by bang001
ahhh, so then it can be detected, i really don't wanna risk that lol, i didnt know i could get the same code as them, i thought it wasnt possible
- - - Updated - - -
Originally Posted by Meatstake
The chance for that to happen is really really small, if this is the case, you my friend are very unlucky. But there is another way how a encrypted hack can be detected; The creator of the Hack itself who decides to encrypt it with poly is able to define exactly what should be randomized, where there should be junk-code etc. and if he makes one little mistake, the whole protection of poly is gone. VAC just needs to remember one little pattern in the code and you cant use the hack anymore safely. My guess would be thats what happened to polygreen, but i rly cant assure you that. Its just a guess..
Yes it is unique atm my friend. But after decryption, every code will look exactly the same: the way it looked like before it was encrypted by poly
Yes it is unique atm my friend. But after decryption, every code will look exactly the same: the way it looked like before it was encrypted by poly
Its a little more protected than that :P
Code itself actually gets changed, not just junk.
Read my other post above to your ^^
- - - Updated - - -
Originally Posted by MadDragonFlyer
UD as of now? if i use triggerbot only
