Randomhacker was a choob until he spammed the shit out of all the forums and got his post count up ridicousely quick
New hack?
Originally Posted by JIGS4W
You are very right and logical. I like how you think
If you were being serious, thank you.
Originally Posted by Tooks
If you were being sarcastic, thank you.
If you were being serious, thank you.
If you were being serious, thank you.
Originally Posted by randomnamekabe
Randomhacker was a choob until he spammed the shit out of all the forums and got his post count up ridicousely quick
I didn't even care about MPGH until to like the 3rd week I joined. My activity level was staying nice and still at 3% then I started picking up and comment a lot on the hack threads cuz I download every hack that people says that it works. Then for like 4 weeks CA section is all I go I didn't go anywhere Originally Posted by JIGS4W
Im not being sarcastic... You are a smart thinker
I didn't even care about MPGH until to like the 3rd week I joined. My activity level was staying nice and still at 3% then I started picking up and comment a lot on the hack threads cuz I download every hack that people says that it works. Then for like 4 weeks CA section is all I go I didn't go anywhere
I didn't even care about MPGH until to like the 3rd week I joined. My activity level was staying nice and still at 3% then I started picking up and comment a lot on the hack threads cuz I download every hack that people says that it works. Then for like 4 weeks CA section is all I go I didn't go anywhereYou have a 1400 posts in less than 4 months.
I mean WOW
I mean WOW
Originally Posted by randomnamekabe
You have a 1400 posts in less than 4 months.
I mean WOW
I mean WOW
I started focusing on MPGH when Gordon released his hack and in every game theres at least like 5 hackers. I quit CA so I go on MPGH plus I go on everyday spent a few hours on it
i think you guys are straying from the point of this post... I mean I think you guys should talk more about how to find this new hack and where to get it.
Originally Posted by toxicrazor
i think you guys are straying from the point of this post... I mean I think you guys should talk more about how to find this new hack and where to get it.
Originally Posted by toxicrazor
Tooks, did you ever find out what site the new hack came from?
Tooks, did you ever find out what site the new hack came from?
Please do put up where to get it once you do find out where it is from
Originally Posted by toxicrazor
Please do put up where to get it once you do find out where it is from
Here's what I think should be changed:
Instead of automatically disapproving a new working hack just because of an ad, simply require that the person releasing the hack must let it be publicly known in the thread that it contains an ad. The person releasing the hacks should also state what the ad is for and what website it is advertising.
Hacks should only be disapproved if they are fake or dangerous.
This way, the community takes it upon themselves to choose what they download and if they care if the hack contains ads or not. If a hack is released that contains ads, you may still download it if you wish and more people can go on hacking happily.
Does this not seem fair?
absolutely
Originally Posted by toxicrazor
absolutely
Anyone else?
Originally Posted by Tooks
I'll find a way to share it with you guys without MPGH interfering, should I come across it.
Here's what I think should be changed:
Instead of automatically disapproving a new working hack just because of an ad, simply require that the person releasing the hack must let it be publicly known in the thread that it contains an ad. The person releasing the hacks should also state what the ad is for and what website it is advertising.
Hacks should only be disapproved if they are fake or dangerous.
This way, the community takes it upon themselves to choose what they download and if they care if the hack contains ads or not. If a hack is released that contains ads, you may still download it if you wish and more people can go on hacking happily.
Does this not seem fair?
Here's what I think should be changed:
Instead of automatically disapproving a new working hack just because of an ad, simply require that the person releasing the hack must let it be publicly known in the thread that it contains an ad. The person releasing the hacks should also state what the ad is for and what website it is advertising.
Hacks should only be disapproved if they are fake or dangerous.
This way, the community takes it upon themselves to choose what they download and if they care if the hack contains ads or not. If a hack is released that contains ads, you may still download it if you wish and more people can go on hacking happily.
Does this not seem fair?
. It does makes MPGH a bit fairer and better Originally Posted by JIGS4W
I do agree with you Tooks. Convinced . It does makes MPGH a bit fairer and better
. It does makes MPGH a bit fairer and betterThis thread is closed for replies.
