Outdated[X27.0.1] 059client
I had done my own checks and based on what you've stated in your thread about it being a clean client with only several hacks added into the client, I didn't see a reason for so many alterations in the code.
I was also brought to attention that you've had help from someone who has been known for phishing.
Unless you can provide a reason why so many lines of code was altered regarding the account areas of the client, the information I've been brought has deemed it unsafe.
I was also brought to attention that you've had help from someone who has been known for phishing.
Unless you can provide a reason why so many lines of code was altered regarding the account areas of the client, the information I've been brought has deemed it unsafe.
If you are considering changes between _local_1 and _local1, the changes will be great.
However, I have only added the files for the hack required...
I have no intention of phishing users accounts, and if you are purely basing of the fact that I have "lots of edited files", I would request you to check out the misc tab in options, where you will see a long list of hacks that are added.
- - - Updated - - -
As far as receiving help is concerned, I do not see anything wrong.
I got him to help me set a few things up, which doesn't mean that my client has phishing software in it.
However, I have only added the files for the hack required...
I have no intention of phishing users accounts, and if you are purely basing of the fact that I have "lots of edited files", I would request you to check out the misc tab in options, where you will see a long list of hacks that are added.
- - - Updated - - -
As far as receiving help is concerned, I do not see anything wrong.
I got him to help me set a few things up, which doesn't mean that my client has phishing software in it.
Previous releases of mine have been declined for similar reasons. In my case I was using a different version of the Flex SDK when compiling so there were many changes all over the client. It took a frustrating number of submissions to get a client with very few functional changes released because the mod wasn't confident in the thoroughness of their check over such a large area. It is a good thing that mods don't release content when they aren't confident, I just wish they would give every submission a chance by taking as long as they need to come to a yes or no conclusion about its safety.
Yeah, I completely agree. What is the logic behind denying uploads due to too many changes? Every creator has their own style and way to do things, in my case, all the variables were different to the standard version, and there is nothing I can do about it. If you guys want to be that picky, you can go and refactor everything for me, I won't mind.
The only edits which he is probably looking at, is the new pet system, which was added.
Then, the variable names changing.
I have added a bunch of QOL updates and Auto-Nexus.
But I guess the mods want to approve a bunch of shit clients with huge amounts of bugs, instead of those that has everything updated and runs smoothly.
I mean a lot of people have made multiple posts for new clients, yet they all get deleted, because "there is one already exisiting" (even though the existing ones are a 10 minute asset updated client, 0 effort put into it, can't even bother to update the pet yard even though its so simple).
I guess the minions are performing their job very well. (/s).
Then, the variable names changing.
I have added a bunch of QOL updates and Auto-Nexus.
But I guess the mods want to approve a bunch of shit clients with huge amounts of bugs, instead of those that has everything updated and runs smoothly.
I mean a lot of people have made multiple posts for new clients, yet they all get deleted, because "there is one already exisiting" (even though the existing ones are a 10 minute asset updated client, 0 effort put into it, can't even bother to update the pet yard even though its so simple).
I guess the minions are performing their job very well. (/s).
when i load in the game its just players with no ground and if i try to connect somewhere else it just says conneciton failed then logs me out
*shrug* You should just post the edits in the "account section" of the client to prove that it's legit. I agree that having a ton of edits in the account section of the client is kinda suspicious, but your client should be approved as long as you prove that it is safe.
keep getting connection failed
lol what are you talking about, we've had 4 different crazy clients approved for this patch alone, each with more and more bugfixes.
honestly, you're just asking to be banned. Quit while your ahead or you'll end up like Binary
honestly, you're just asking to be banned. Quit while your ahead or you'll end up like Binary
This thread is closed for replies.
