Skip to content
MPGHThe Dark Arts
/
RegisterLog in
Forum
Community
What's NewLatest posts across the boardTrendingHottest threads right nowSubscribedThreads you follow
Discussion
GeneralIntroductionsEntertainmentDebate FortFlaming & Rage
Board
News & AnnouncementsMPGH TimesSuggestions & HelpGiveaways
More Sections
Art & Graphic DesignProgrammingHackingCryptocurrency
Hacks & Cheats
Games
ValorantCS2 / CS:GOCall of Duty / WarzoneFortniteApex LegendsEscape From Tarkov
+14 moreLeague of LegendsGTA VMinecraftRustROTMGBattlefieldTroveBattleOnCombat ArmsCrossFireBlackshotRuneScapeDayZDead by Daylight
Resources
Game Hacking TutorialsReverse EngineeringGeneral Game HackingAnti-CheatConsole Game Hacking
Tools
Game Hacking ToolsTrainers & CheatsHack/Release NewsNew
Submit a release →Share your cheat, tool, or config with the community.
AINEW
AI Tools
General & DiscussionPrompt EngineeringLLM JailbreaksHotAI Agents & AutomationLocal / Open Models
AI × Gaming
AI Aimbots & VisionML Anti-CheatGame Bots & Automation
Create
AI Coding / Vibe CodingAI Art & MediaAI Voice & TTS
The AI frontier →Where game hacking meets modern machine learning. Jump in.
Marketplace
Buy & Sell
SellingBuyingTradingUser Services
Trust & Safety
Middleman LoungeMarketplace TalkVouch Copy Profiles
Money
Cryptocurrency TalkCurrency ExchangeWork & Job Offers
Start selling →List accounts, services, and goods. Use the middleman to trade safe.
MPGH The Dark Arts

A community for offensive security research, reverse engineering, and AI.

Community

ForumMarketplaceSearch

Account

RegisterLog in

Legal

Privacy PolicyForum RulesHelp & FAQ
© 2026 MPGH · All rights reserved.Built by the community, for the community. For educational purposes onlyContent is shared for security research and education — we don't condone illegal use. You're responsible for complying with applicable laws. Use at your own risk.
Home › Forum › Market Place › User Services › [IMPORTANT] Rule change regarding refunders payment

Exclamation[IMPORTANT] Rule change regarding refunders payment

Posts 1–15 of 31 · Page 1 of 3
RE
RespectNF
[IMPORTANT] Rule change regarding refunders payment
We have encountered multiple situations in which refunders are delaying or not completing their orders while previously getting paid for it. This can lead to an amount of problems,specifically for the buyers which in most cases have a time limit for getting their refund done.

Therefore we are required to introduce a new rule which is effective starting today [9/6/2019] and until further notice.

All payments for refunding services must be done after refunder gives proof of a successful refund.

risk of failure needs to be stated clearly on your shop

If you are a buyer of refunding services: You will pay for your refund after refunder provides you with proof it's completed.(Or if the refund goes through to your payment method)

If you are a seller of refunding services: You are allowed to receive payment for your services only after you provide proof of a completed refund or if buyer gets proof on his own.(Like refund going through to his payment method)

If you are not a refunder and you are not buying any services related to refunding: This rule doesn't impact you in any way. If you get asked to pay before confirmation, please report the situation to staff.


Only exemption to this rule is if a middleman is used. When using a middleman payment can be sent to the middleman before the service is completed. Middleman will release the money after proof of a successful refund is given and/or buyer confirms he received it. If you are interested in using a middleman click here. Middleman may or may not charge a fee,check with them.
#1 · edited 5y ago · 6y ago
MoneyMachine
MoneyMachine
Best rule change so far! Hope this will improve the way services are offered. GJ
#2 · 6y ago
Evan MacMillan
Evan MacMillan
Good refunders should never charge in advance to begin with. But praise the change!
#3 · 6y ago
HomeScillet
HomeScillet
o shit noice, ezpz way to weed out the exiters
#4 · 6y ago
smetonas
smetonas
Welcoming change, 99% of the people asking for up-front payment were scammers.
#5 · 6y ago
Prove Them Wrong
Prove Them Wrong
Amazing rule change, I wish this were the rule for SE'ing as well. I've seen many exit scams via SE services.
#6 · 6y ago
RO
Royce
This is old news. I never understood paying refunders before they actually got the job done. Niggas be exit scamming.
#7 · 6y ago
Flengo
[MPGH]Flengo
Quote Originally Posted by Prove Them Wrong View Post
Amazing rule change, I wish this were the rule for SE'ing as well. I've seen many exit scams via SE services.
Might be something to look into in the future. This was particularly done for refunding because it was clear that many refunders were taking way too many orders and not being able to complete most of them. Usually people in SE services are quicker to get their work done, so far.

If similar situations happen with SE services then yeah could be applied to them as well.
#8 · 6y ago
niggo
niggo
Quote Originally Posted by Flengo View Post
If similar situations happen with SE services then yeah could be applied to them as well.
i would even say the risk of people just straight up scamming is a lot higher with SE services
as we unfortunately have seen in the past

or atleast a limit as to how many orders they are allowed to take at first might help too
#9 · 6y ago
GU
GUESS_HU
Quote Originally Posted by MoneyMachine View Post
Best rule change so far! Hope this will improve the way services are offered. GJ
For real!!
#10 · 6y ago
yawo
yawo
We all know who this rule was made for
#11 · 6y ago
Hova
[MPGH]Hova
refunders mad af now
#12 · 6y ago
Prove Them Wrong
Prove Them Wrong
Quote Originally Posted by Flengo View Post


Might be something to look into in the future. This was particularly done for refunding because it was clear that many refunders were taking way too many orders and not being able to complete most of them. Usually people in SE services are quicker to get their work done, so far.

If similar situations happen with SE services then yeah could be applied to them as well.
That's good to hear!! Hopefully it doesn't happen in the first place to need to be implimented, but from what I've observed with my long-time here is it does happen and wouldn't be surprised to see it happen again, unfortunately.

Quote Originally Posted by niggo View Post


i would even say the risk of people just straight up scamming is a lot higher with SE services
as we unfortunately have seen in the past

or atleast a limit as to how many orders they are allowed to take at first might help too
That Dama incident was insane and it was done via refunding service. Not diminishing the fact that it DOES happen in SE's though.

Quote Originally Posted by Hova View Post
refunders mad af now
Lmao! Too bad. Convenience opens the door for exploitation, whether it's methods used to sign into a digital account, a store with a good returns policy, or even the marketplace here.
#13 · 6y ago
niggo
niggo
Quote Originally Posted by Prove Them Wrong View Post
That Dama incident was insane and it was done via refunding service. Not diminishing the fact that it DOES happen in SE's though
he scammed with his samsung "SE" service

also in the years ive been on MPGH and other forums ive seen more than enough scams related to SEing
its just the nature of that service that makes it easy for someone to make a quick buck
#14 · 6y ago
LE
Lemvar
Thanks for fixing!
#15 · 6y ago
Posts 1–15 of 31 · Page 1 of 3

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

  • [IMPORTANT] Rules for Taking HacksBy Toshie in Alliance of Valiant Arms (AVA) Hacks & Cheats
    21Last post 15y ago
  • User title Rule Change?By Cal in General
    9Last post 15y ago
  • [Important] Rules, Requeriments and More. [Please Read]By ahmed1hesham in CrossFire Tutorials
    2Last post 14y ago
  • There should be a rule changeBy InCognito in General
    13Last post 14y ago

Tags for this Thread

None