War

Posts 46–60 of 64 · Page 4 of 5
Quote Originally Posted by tdct View Post


First of all, my uncle is a vet, he has a purple heart, and he agrees with me, and the vets that say no, say it because to them it's a slap in the face, and one that they are not willing to carry. They would say no due to emotion and nothing more, and second off since you said "vet" your most likely American, and our soldiers are volunteer, do you really expect the most intelligible of answers for people who volunteered to be pawns in our governments game? Yes, some vets are incredibly intelligent, but they most likely joined for a reason superior to that of the many. If your looking for a group of soldiers with perspective to ask about war, your best bet would be to find an Israeli citizen, they've all been soldiers at one point, unless they're disable, you would have a better chance of finding someone intelligible with military experience over there, that's why mouzie's answer carries a greater weight than the answers of your idiotic friends.

Lol, your like the perfect example of naive egomaniac.


If you were smart like paroxysm, i'd respect you probably, but an argument built on nothing but insults and ego-boosters isn't a very good one.
--------------------------------

Mouzie being an Israeli soldier in itself is pretty debatable anyway on the internet but w/e.
---------------------------------

What I am realizing is that majority is on my side.

.
Quote Originally Posted by Empire View Post



Lol, your like the perfect example of naive egomaniac.


If you were smart like paroxysm, i'd respect you probably, but an argument built on nothing but insults and ego-boosters isn't a very good one.
--------------------------------

Mouzie being an Israeli soldier in itself is pretty debatable anyway on the internet but w/e.
---------------------------------

What I am realizing is that majority is on my side

.
The majority is wrong all to ofter, and, "If you were smart like paroxysm, I'd respect you probably, but an argument built on nothing but insults and ego-boosters isn't a very good one," is something extremely ironic/audacious for you to say, should I go back through our arguments and compile a list of quotes? Case after case I respond with a strong argument, with reason as my backing. On the other hand we have you, whose sole argument is based on emotion as apposed to reason. I can't believe you actually typed that, but thank you for the laugh.
Quote Originally Posted by tdct View Post


The majority is wrong all to ofter, and, "If you were smart like paroxysm, I'd respect you probably, but an argument built on nothing but insults and ego-boosters isn't a very good one," is something extremely ironic/audacious for you to say, should I go back through our arguments and compile a list of quotes? Case after case I respond with a strong argument, with reason as my backing. On the other hand we have you, whose sole argument is based on emotion as apposed to reason. I can't believe you actually typed that, but thank you for the laugh.
You lose get the fuck over it.
Quote Originally Posted by Empire View Post


You lose get the fuck over it.
What an intelligible response. Even better that shows that you do care, at least until you realize that you've lost and convince yourself that you don't. This reminds of most multilayer games, when someone gets whipped so hard they just can't take it, they just say, "you loose", or, "hack" or something along those lines, get over yourself you ego maniacal fail. Saying, "You lose get the fuck over it." makes you a total hypocrite, considering you just criticized me for having no backing to my arguments (even though that isn't true ). Now go on, convince yourself that your prior post wasn't an absolute fail, and post something you perceive to be better. After all saying, "You win," would be way to complicated.
Quote Originally Posted by tdct View Post


What an intelligible response. Even better that shows that you do care, at least until you realize that you've lost and convince yourself that you don't. This reminds of most multilayer games, when someone gets whipped so hard they just can't take it, they just say, "you loose", or, "hack" or something along those lines, get over yourself you ego maniacal fail. Saying, "You lose get the fuck over it." makes you a total hypocrite, considering you just criticized me for having no backing to my arguments (even though that isn't true ). Now go on, convince yourself that your prior post wasn't an absolute fail, and post something you perceive to be better. After all saying, "You win," would be way to complicated.
I'm not reading any more walls of text, sorry.

You lose, get the fuck over it.
Quote Originally Posted by Empire View Post


I'm not reading any more walls of text, sorry.

You lose, get the fuck over it.
It's only a paragraph, and you did read it, and anyone else who did will see that you loose.
btw thanks for your response, it proved all my attacks on your ego
Quote Originally Posted by tdct View Post


It's only a paragraph, and you did read it, and anyone else who did will see that you loose.
btw thanks for your response, it proved all my attacks on your ego
You haven't spelled lose correctly once.

I loose alright lulz.

?_? i actually didn't read it, since you type walls of text that basically could be said in one line, if that.

Mmmkay, have fun being naive.
Quote Originally Posted by Empire View Post


You haven't spelled lose correctly once.

I loose alright lulz.

?_? i actually didn't read it, since you type walls of text that basically could be said in one line, if that.

Mmmkay, have fun being naive.
Dude, my prior post was only a two lines, and the one before that only a paragraph, and if your best argument against my perspective, is my reflexive misspeling of the word lose,(which hardly effects the strength of my argument) then you have undoubtedly lost.
Quote Originally Posted by tdct View Post


First of all, my uncle is a vet, he has a purple heart, and he agrees with me, and the vets that say no, say it because to them it's a slap in the face, and one that they are not willing to carry. They would say no due to emotion and nothing more, and second off since you said "vet" your most likely American, and our soldiers are volunteer, do you really expect the most intelligible of answers for people who volunteered to be pawns in our governments game? Yes, some vets are incredibly intelligent, but they most likely joined for a reason superior to that of the many. If your looking for a group of soldiers with perspective to ask about war, your best bet would be to find an Israeli citizen, they've all been soldiers at one point, unless they're disable, you would have a better chance of finding someone intelligible with military experience over there, that's why mouzie's answer carries a greater weight than the answers of your idiotic friends.
The last time I checked, you don't die in a game. People aren't pawns like in a game of chess, btw. People have lives, dreams, ideas. Things worth fighting for. When you say war is a game your saying everybody else has no dreams or lives and that they are just tools to be used as playthings.

Also, the fact that your uncle is a vet and has a purple heart is very, very debatable. And I'm guessig your too naive to know this, but most Israeli citizens HAVEN'T been a soldier, because of the actual wars being fought. Saying that most of the Israeli have been a soldier/Al-Queda is like saying Barack Obama is white and from Canada.
"loose" is how i spell it :P

Empire in all due respect, Muslim and taliban are not the same thing, Extremist are not The same as peaceful muslim.

Hitler was a Christian who condoned the beginning of the holocaust, but muslims NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER use Hitler as a symbol to christians.

Buddhist and hindus are pagans (Not saying it in a bad way / kinda tells for its self "pagan")..But yeah there pagans and no religion uses it against them.

Muslim is the only religion that gets called "terrorist" and crap all because?...

M.E.D.I.A, the western worlds greatest tool, yes in middle east theres bad stuff on tv, but 7% of what the US says on muslims.

Back to the point, Muslims dont believe in fighting for "governmental issues", and "oil" and crap, we fight for the religion of Islam, and for the holy lands, which we live and die for.
and live again and get judged for.

Cycle:
Born + Live + Die + Born + Judged = Hell/Heaven (this is up to you).
Uh.................can you not spam my thread visible?

@Tdct: the fact you are still posting, means i win.
war is no game and chess is a fun game! :]
I never thought that any war made by the US in the last 100 was worth it,apart from ww2 and ww1,which they didn't want to join much,at 2 they got attacked,and at 1 they joined 3 years after.
but dude,converting people to your religion with holy war isn't the greatest thing in the world.
that's what missionaries do
Quote Originally Posted by Casavir View Post
I never thought that any war made by the US in the last 100 was worth it,apart from ww2 and ww1,which they didn't want to join much,at 2 they got attacked,and at 1 they joined 3 years after.
but dude,converting people to your religion with holy war isn't the greatest thing in the world.
that's what missionaries do
United States been in few wars, most of it are conflicts.
Empire, whos spamming ur thread? what now making points is spamming a thread? spamming = going off topic with useless crap.

Im on topic, learn the meaning.
Posts 46–60 of 64 · Page 4 of 5

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread

None

Talk with us