4D ?

Originally Posted by Supreme

I live in 1 dimension problem?

There's no such thing as 1 dimensional shapes.

Uneducated?

Originally Posted by Rvn

There's no such thing as 1 dimensional shapes.

Uneducated?

Prove it .

Originally Posted by Rvn

There's no such thing as 1 dimensional shapes.

Uneducated?

Well one can consider a vertex to be an example of 1D =\

Originally Posted by Alen

Well one can consider a vertex to be an example of 1D =\

If I'm not totally stupid, I think I remember vertex being a point of a shape, and not the shape itself.

Originally Posted by Locke

If I'm not totally stupid, I think I remember vertex being a point of a shape, and not the shape itself.

True, I don't quite recall him saying he lived in a 1D shape though

And yes, a line is 1D too, seeing as it only expands in one way / dimension or however you want to explain this to yourself

1D = Line .

Originally Posted by Supreme

Thats not 4d.

but hey he lives on Nigeria...BTW yunogetnigboi?

Originally Posted by **Seals**

but hey he lives on Nigeria...BTW yunogetnigboi?

Oh

And that group is only for Obama and King. Swag.

Originally Posted by 666HiddenMaster666

1D = Line .

If you have a vertical line that has no fill the horizontal way, you wouldn't see it, aka it wouldn't be there, aka it can't exist.

No matter how hard you try, you need two dimentions on a shape for the eye to be able to see it. Even if the line is extremely thin, you can enlarge it, and see something in another dimention.

Originally Posted by Locke

No matter how hard you try, you need two dimentions on a shape for the eye to be able to see it. Even if the line is extremely thin, you can enlarge it, and see something in another dimention.

A line cannot be seen if it resides in one dimension only. inb4 debate about mathematical platonism and empericism

Originally Posted by Alen

A line cannot be seen if it resides in one dimension only. inb4 debate about mathematical platonism and empericism

Alright, fine

Originally Posted by Nyan

So technically 4D is real life?

I thought it was 3D, but 4D is suppose to be a dimensional, not a feeling kinda thing.

I'm pretty sure none of us can imagine 4D. And 3D is quite literally seen as if it were 3D. How well you can cope with what's being seen is a different thing, some people just can't get used to the shuttering and somehow manage to lose the 3D effect. I personally find it amazing

Originally Posted by Locke

Alright, fine

Was scared you were gonna say your a logicist

4D is not much different from 3D. They just incorporate smells and feeling. I've been to a 4D show in Disney and that was the only difference

So technically 4D is real life?

I thought it was 3D, but 4D is suppose to be a dimensional, not a feeling kinda thing.

Post a Reply

Tags for this Thread