Dupe Method #19.4.0

I believe that one makes 21...

Yes, yes it does
And this should make 22...

You are correct sir!
Also, someone's post count isn't what determines if their new to a forum or not.

Their join Date then? March 2014!
Either way, I am new

I released that code you retarded fuck. LOLOL.

With express written permission from MLB. No but forreal, is that supposed to be a secret? Its literally in the FAQ if you know what Bitcoin is o.O And if not "it does math" keeps me from having to explain the concept to people who don't give a shit and just want sweet Realm hackz.

Ask jnoob, he's the master account stealer from account stealers.

Um, cehrenr?

"V" is most peoples hpot hot key...

Seriously @The Language, lel u mad bruh?

Are you the owner of the whitebag client? Don't get me wrong, its a nice client, obviously I used it. My point is that whoever is updating it, only does so after the content is released on here. If you release the code and are the owner of WB then why update WB 2nd?
And lol, jnoob steals so I can too. Classy.
^{eula #15 sucsk ass and doesn't even work w/ av lel}

Yes.

This patch is the first one in quite a while the mod selector was approved here before I updated. I almost always update before MPGH because I don't need to wait for someone else's approval to push a build. 9/10 times, the WBC swf will be updated before anything on MPGH is. And there have been multiple times in the past when the WBC swf was released here instead of someone coding it themselves, lol. Like I said, you are very clearly new here and just enjoy talking out of your ass. Which is fine.

I don't steal anything. You just admitted to using the WBC - did your account get hacked?

And yes, a lot of the original mining software was apparently flagged by AV. Learned that after the fact, and have spent a considerable portion of time fixing the issue. I don't bother w/ AV because they're almost entirely useless. It should be pretty compatible now - I've gone through the top 10 AV (which covers something like 80% of worldwide users) and any of them I couldn't get a whitelist for I simply disabled the mining if the AV is on the user's computer. I think there are 5-6 AV that are just incompatible, and 4 of them are so obscure its irrelevant. I could go further and make it completely bypass AV entirely, but that borders on the 'sketch' and I'd rather just disable it for a small % of users if its going to cause problems.

Yes, I am new (think I stated that already) I will stand corrected on my earlier comment. But 19.3 and 19.4 both seemed to be on here before WB...
Yes, I used WBC.
No, winmine.exe still causes problems.
You said that 5-6 AV aren't compatible so you must know them. How about stating that on your FAQ? You said 4 were obscure so only 1-2 are the real problem. Then I must be stuck with the 1-2 of them because on the 2 different computers that I am currently using they both block them.
Updater.exe gets flagged. (virustotal.com/, those do look pretty obscure if that is what you are talking about)
I'v talked to you before about this

Pretty sure I had 19.3 out beforehand, 19.4 I flat out just went to bed and didn't care because I was having issues getting the Updater to work properly. In fairness, a lot of it depends on Cryo's sleep schedule syncing up with a minion's since he is the only one who bothers to update around here nowadays. Even so, it doesn't mean I'm not updating it myself (I am) - or that I'm not capable of doing so (again, I am) and to come here and immediately go off on that tangent is silly. Especially since I'm the last person here who has actually released a useful contribution to .swf clients last I checked the release section.

Yes, those in the VT report are, AFAIK, incredibly obscure AV reports and aren't even listed on the worldwide market share data I was able to find. I use a different online scanner that has 60 AV and only returns 7 flags. They're also incredibly terrible at what they do - all of them just give a "this thing is downloading an .exe file - kill it with fire!" result. Nothing I can do about that without purposefully implementing anti-AV features and I have no interest in crossing that border.

As of 3/6/2014 (US dating system) the miner itself will disable if you have an AV that flags it and is actually used by a large % of users. I've only had 4-5 people report issues to me regarding AV before I got a "basic" fix out and I'm guessing you're the guy who had WebRoot or some such named thing? I can't find an online scanner that has it as an option, and it isn't on any of the marketshare reports I can find, so yea - you are quite literally the 1% lol.

Here:

http://www.opswat.com/about/media/re...s-january-2014

Bitdefender is the biggest of those AV programs, and it owns a whopping 2.6% of worldwide market share (user usage). Realistically, anything below McAfee isn't worth my time to troubleshoot. I can toss it into the FAQ, but I'd have to learn how to set up exceptions in those AV programs to explain it properly, and that'd involve downloading each of them and figuring that out. Incredibly time consuming for something hardly anyone has an issue with - although I can understand frustrating for the small # of users it is an issue for (yourself, sorry mate lol).