Dupe Method #19.4.0

Originally Posted by cehrenr

Pretty sure I had 19.3 out beforehand, 19.4 I flat out just went to bed and didn't care because I was having issues getting the Updater to work properly. In fairness, a lot of it depends on Cryo's sleep schedule syncing up with a minion's since he is the only one who bothers to update around here nowadays. Even so, it doesn't mean I'm not updating it myself (I am) - or that I'm not capable of doing so (again, I am) and to come here and immediately go off on that tangent is silly. Especially since I'm the last person here who has actually released a useful contribution to .swf clients last I checked the release section.

Yes, those in the VT report are, AFAIK, incredibly obscure AV reports and aren't even listed on the worldwide market share data I was able to find. I use a different online scanner that has 60 AV and only returns 7 flags. They're also incredibly terrible at what they do - all of them just give a "this thing is downloading an .exe file - kill it with fire!" result. Nothing I can do about that without purposefully implementing anti-AV features and I have no interest in crossing that border.

As of 3/6/2014 (US dating system) the miner itself will disable if you have an AV that flags it and is actually used by a large % of users. I've only had 4-5 people report issues to me regarding AV before I got a "basic" fix out and I'm guessing you're the guy who had WebRoot or some such named thing? I can't find an online scanner that has it as an option, and it isn't on any of the marketshare reports I can find, so yea - you are quite literally the 1% lol.

Here:

Bitdefender is the biggest of those AV programs, and it owns a whopping 2.6% of worldwide market share (user usage). Realistically, anything below McAfee isn't worth my time to troubleshoot. I can toss it into the FAQ, but I'd have to learn how to set up exceptions in those AV programs to explain it properly, and that'd involve downloading each of them and figuring that out. Incredibly time consuming for something hardly anyone has an issue with - although I can understand frustrating for the small # of users it is an issue for (yourself, sorry mate lol).

Webroot on my girlfriends computer, McAfee on mine. I actually don't use Mcafee anymore. Webroot comes with alot of windows 8 computers, if you get them from BestBuy, thats the only reason why she has it. I noticed that the online scanning tools show that McAfee doesn't show it as a problem, but Mcafee on my computer does...as such I don't really trust the scans online and I scan files myself.

Originally Posted by Necc

Webroot on my girlfriends computer, McAfee on mine. I actually don't use Mcafee anymore. Webroot comes with alot of windows 8 computers, if you get them from BestBuy, thats the only reason why she has it. I noticed that the online scanning tools show that McAfee doesn't show it as a problem, but Mcafee on my computer does...as such I don't really trust the scans online and I scan files myself.

The online virus scans are almost always the absolute most up to date lists for the programs. In general, as I understand it, that would make them better than having the programs installed unless you're fanatical about keeping them up to date.

If you put your computer security in the hands of a program you know throws false positives when every other major program on the market says the file is OK .. Well, idk man, good luck with that. I wouldn't trust something so wildly inaccurate - how do you know it isn't doing the exact opposite at times: letting a file be marked clean that actually isn't.

I wouldn't trust any AV in general no matter how good. Too easy to bypass them entirely nowadays if you can spend even 5 minutes on Google.

Originally Posted by cehrenr

The online virus scans are almost always the absolute most up to date lists for the programs. In general, as I understand it, that would make them better than having the programs installed unless you're fanatical about keeping them up to date.

If you put your computer security in the hands of a program you know throws false positives when every other major program on the market says the file is OK .. Well, idk man, good luck with that. I wouldn't trust something so wildly inaccurate - how do you know it isn't doing the exact opposite at times: letting a file be marked clean that actually isn't.

I wouldn't trust any AV in general no matter how good. Too easy to bypass them entirely nowadays if you can spend even 5 minutes on Google.

Oh, I whole heartily believe that at least 50%+ of all viruses are propagandized and produced by the AV companies themselves. How else could they assure that they stay in business? Anyway, WBC is fine alone, I just thought it mildly humorous that they were leeching from here. Which now I realize that they, you that is, aren't but quite the opposite. Its all great work, I myself couldn't do any of it with my current state of knowledge, but I don't like the constant pop-ups that winmine.exe causes once AV corrupts its process.

Originally Posted by cehrenr

Bitdefender is the biggest of those AV programs, and it owns a whopping 2.6% of worldwide market share (user usage). Realistically, anything below McAfee isn't worth my time to troubleshoot. I can toss it into the FAQ, but I'd have to learn how to set up exceptions in those AV programs to explain it properly, and that'd involve downloading each of them and figuring that out. Incredibly time consuming for something hardly anyone has an issue with - although I can understand frustrating for the small # of users it is an issue for (yourself, sorry mate lol).

So what do you think would be a good antivirus program for your computer?

Originally Posted by HappyMan20

So what do you think would be a good antivirus program for your computer?

Yourself. There are three ways to deal with computer security nowadays:

* No AV, nothing of value on your PC, download w/e the fuck you want because it doesn't matter. So what if your home connection is being used to DDoS a LoL game, does it honestly matter to you?
* No AV, something of value on your PC, don't download shit if you aren't intelligent enough to decompile it.
* No AV, something of value on your PC, download w/e the fuck you want as long as you decompile and make sure its safe.

I guess the fourth is:

* AV - false sense of security with something that can be bypassed by the nastiest programs on the Internet with 5 minutes on Google and $20.

Idk, maybe someone with more expertise can answer that. I have MSE installed simply because it was on the Ninite package I had, don't think its ever raised a fuss about anything I've downloaded though.

Originally Posted by cehrenr

Yourself. There are three ways to deal with computer security nowadays:

* No AV, nothing of value on your PC, download w/e the fuck you want because it doesn't matter. So what if your home connection is being used to DDoS a LoL game, does it honestly matter to you?
* No AV, something of value on your PC, don't download shit if you aren't intelligent enough to decompile it.
* No AV, something of value on your PC, download w/e the fuck you want as long as you decompile and make sure its safe.

I guess the fourth is:

* AV - false sense of security with something that can be bypassed by the nastiest programs on the Internet with 5 minutes on Google and $20.

Idk, maybe someone with more expertise can answer that. I have MSE installed simply because it was on the Ninite package I had, don't think its ever raised a fuss about anything I've downloaded though.

Malwarebytes is the way to be
@barm

Originally Posted by marceliino

Malwarebytes is the way to be
@barm

Truf. I don't really consider MWB/Ad-Block/similar programs computer security though. They're never going to detect a virus or anything programatically harmful on run-time, they're just there so advertisers can't skull fuck your PC into oblivion. Ever load MPGH without that shit? I didn't know pop-under advertising still existed on the Internet until I found this place. Thought that shit died in the 90's -,- lol.

Originally Posted by Pepsi Cola

8 pages. This thread has trolled hard.

this isnt a troll.
@barm

Thanks man I <3 you.

Actually got it to work once! Took 2 hrs, but duped an ep, will be trying it tomorrow with a couple fulmis. Will also use hypercam. I think this method is an offshoot of the real one, because so far I've tried about 700 times, and gotten it to work once... even with a customized script. I SHALL FIND YER SECRETS

Originally Posted by 059

AHK script to help with step 4 and 5. Press O, clicks back to home, then spams where play is. You will have to change coordinates.

Not even worth the time imo. You can edit the muledump.html to reload every second or every 5 seconds or any amount of time you choose.

Guys this is a troll...

@BARm told me something new about the D00p so @BARm if you dont want us to work out a way to do it good you know what to do. @BARm

Guys this is troll made by @Raple and some of his other friends...

Originally Posted by cehrenr

Ask jnoob, he's the master account stealer from account stealers.

What's the problem with hacking accounts of account stealers?
They deserve it if they hack people and are dumb enough to put sensible informations in their shit, like "potholder"

There is a little difference between coding +spreading a stealer and analysing existing stealers.

I didnt put a WB updater on my RWT website with embedded stealing code in it. Whatever you say to anyone blaming you it doesnt matter, you didnt have to do it in the beginning. People wont forget that.

You own spam bots too, and people dont like that.

Its just sad that many people forget your great contributions to this community because of previous bullshit.

Now i see random dudes saying you are "stealing code"...lmao.
No one here can really claim "its my client, i made it" because it always contains some code from others hackers.
Every serious hacker here released their own client : nilly's client, jnoob client, etc...
ceh is hacking clients like us.

WB client is a good one, and since you are able to code real stuff there is no problem to call it like that

TLDR: people stop saying shit about WB'owner. Blame him for his old mistakes , period. Dont say he didnt code anything or is just leeching stuff, this is WRONG.

Post a Reply

Similar Threads